Angry New Yorker |
||
Semi-Daily Rants from New York City's Angry Man
"As I know more of mankind I expect less of them, and am ready now to call a man a good man, upon easier terms than I was formerly."
- Dr. Samuel Johnson, Boswell, Life of Johnson, Sept. 1783
Archives
Public Interest National Interest National Review New Criterion Commentary First Things The New Atlantis Foreign Affairs Am. Enterprise Hudson Review Policy Review OpinionJournal-WSJ City Journal American Prowler NY Observer News Washington Post Wall Street Journal C.S.Monitor New York Times Washington Times Financial Times Int'l Hrld-Trb Fox News NY Sun Blogs Tacitus Instapundit The Diplomad Right Wing News Tim Blair Belmont Club Little Green Footballs Powerline Iraq Related Blogs Command Post - Iraq IRAQ NOW... Jason Van S. Sgt. Stryker Digital WarFighter Boots on Ground Healing Iraq U.S.S. Clueless Iraq The Model/a> Iraq & Iraqi's Iraq at a Glance Geopolitics/Defense DefenseLink Defend America Jane's Stratfor Global Security Strategy Page DefenseTech Ctr. for Security Policy Economics/Finance Poor and Stupid Institutional Economics The Capital Spectator The Knowledge Problem Economic Principals The Chicago School SSRN Misc. Federalist Society FindArticles Law Adams Drafting How Appealing The Volokh Conspiracy Cyberspace Lawyer Blog Oyez JOLT Digest Founders' Constitution Eric Goldman's Tech & Mktng Law Blog ScotusWiki |
Friday, February 18, 2005
More madness from the Manhattan Judiciary... We're working to get our hands on the opinion to learn the actual holding's grounds , but while its true that the federal government can't "commander" state executive officers to enforce federal law (see Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898, 925 (1997) (holding "[t]he federal government may not compel the states to implement, by legislation or executive action, federal regulatory programs."), available at here), this strikes us a completely different situation. In addition, if the Senate signs off on the recent House bill that mandates no driver's licenses for illegal aliens, then the Federal legisation would expressly preempt state laws on the issue and the fact that the state executives would, in theory, be required to do something, isn't a specific commandeering, but a standards setting, which happens all the time in Federal/State relations. It's also interesting how the Time and the parties involved categorize this an "immigrant" issue, when everyone involved knows that it's an illegal immigrant problem, not an "immigrant" problem. If a citizen didn't have a social security number or adequate documentation necessary to get a license your denial wouldn't be an immigrant issue would it? Of course not. The real issue, in our opinion, is the notice and hearing matter that's part and parcel of substantive due process claims. Many, though not all, license types are considered "property" for legal purposes, and therefore cancelling the license without an adequate administrative hearing runs into due process violations. It sounds like something along these lines was argued here. We'll see. However, the fact that illegal aliens even have standing to raise this issue to gain a benefit that they shouldn't even have in the first place is infuriating. From today's New York Times: License Denials for Immigrants Are Blocked
Comments:
Post a Comment
|